Reviewed goal in Pens game

see I understand that the onus of proof is to prove that it was actually over the line and that makes it harder to call it a goal, I just didn't see anything in the replays that would indicate that that puck was not over the line, I thought it was pretty clear. Feel free to review it yourself and try and refute me but I say its a goal:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-W-GhiAKYA

(the last replay near the end of the clip is the most damning)

Also alot of posters have made a big deal of it being a 'no goal' call on the ice but all I saw was the ref blowing the play dead when Biron covered up the puck. I guess thats an 'implied' no-goal call but its certainly not a case where the ref made the wash out signal to indicate that it was no goal. I'd like to know the official league policy on this but it would appear that the distinction is irrelevant