Taking a look back at the "expert" pre-season predictions for the Western Conference.
Most predictions are abandoned moments after they are made, never to be visited by their creators again. That's particularly tragic given that the perspective of a carefully examined summer study shold still hold good value months later – and it's a perspective that can be even further improved the following year when its successes and failures are examined.
That's why I'm using the year-end holiday pause to go back to the pre-season projections of almost 100 analysts, and comparing them to the current standings. The goal is to try to learn something by explaining any notable differences, and to use this information to predict what will happen the rest of the way.
Each divisional section begins with a table that breaks down all the relevant information at a high level. Categories include:
- Current position in the standings, which is based on winning percentage, since not every team has played the same number of games. It does not include Friday night's games.
- Expected position in the standings, which is based on the consensus of 97 sets of published projections, which are available here on Dobber.
- The difference in points, which is how many more (or less) points a team would have had to earn to currently stand where they were predicted to be.
- The Luck Index, which is the effect on the standings various luck-based factors have had on a team, as measured in points. Factors (to varying degrees) include injuries, shooting and save percentages, special teams, record in one-goal games, and in the overtime and shootout. It's available at Hockey Abstract.
- Projected position, which is where they are currently projected to finish, using a variety of statistical methods available at Hockey Reference, Sports Club Status, Playoff Status, and Ineffective Math.
We'll start with the Western Conference today, and hit the Eastern Conference next weekend.
Chicago, St. Louis, and Minnesota are all almost exactly where they were expected to be, but Nashville and Winnipeg have been much better, while Colorado and Dallas have been much worse.
Team Win% Current Expected Difference Luck Index Projected
Chicago .703 1st 1st N/A +5 pts 1st
Nashville .700 2nd 6th +9 pts +6 pts 2nd/3rd
St. Louis .688 3rd 2nd -1 pt +3 pts 3rd/4th
Winnipeg .594 4th 7th +10 pts -2 pts 4th/5th
Minnesota .567 5th 4th -2 pts -1 pt 4th/5th
Dallas .483 6th 3rd -13 pts -3 pts 6th
Colorado .452 7th 5th -8 pts -3 pts 7th
The top five teams from the Central division could potentially qualify for the post-season, which will feature a reasonably close three-way race for first, two teams jockeying for one of the better wild card positions, and very little chance for either Dallas and Colorado, the latter of whom could finish as low as 28th overall.
Chicago's backup goaltenders Scott Darling and Antti Raanta have a combined 10-4-0 with a .937 save percentage that will almost certainly cool off eventually, likely affecting the team's unbelievable 91.2% penalty killing percentage. Nevertheless, this team's odds of the Conference's number one seed stand at about 50/50 and it is essentially already a lock for the playoffs. This team's success is surprising no one – two thirds of the analysts pegged them for the divisional crown. Be sure to razz Dobber, one of only five analysts who had the team as low as third.
It's safe to say that Nashville is one of this season's big surprises so far. Congratulate Dave Lozo, the lone analyst who pegged the Predators for second. Shawn Willken predicted third, and only five others pegged the team for fourth. Great coaching, a hot Ribeiro/Forsberg/Neal scoring line, improved possession play, and Vezina-caliber performance from Pekka Rinne are all to credit for the team's success. This team is legit, and will be battling to finish anywhere from first through third, depending how long Rinne stays hot.
St. Louis Blues
Only three analysts pegged the Blues for anything lower than where they currently stand, in third. Even then only 14% even had them this low. Obviously Brian Elliott's injury is a huge factor, but the Blues have still managed an 11-3-1 record in front of the mediocre Jake Allen, thanks in large part to that amazing Schwartz/Lehtera/Tarasenko scoring line. St. Louis very much remains in that three-way horse race for the divisional crown.
Five in six analysts pegged the Jets for the basement, and only Grant Jenkins had them as high as fifth. Unfortunately for the Jets, a massively depleted blue line could make those negative predictions come true, even with unexpectedly solid goaltending. Still, this team is clearly far better than everyone expected, and has about a 55% to 63% chance of making the playoffs for only the second time in its 15-season franchise history.
The Wild are performing almost bang on with expectations, remaining essentially the same as they were last year – a playoff bubble team. Statistically, their odds of making the playoffs are in the 62% to 65% range, which is certainly achievable if the team's goaltending improves, and if high-priced veterans like Thomas Vanek and Mikko Koivu can get their scoring up. Incidentally, Minnesota's fifth place position in the standings is yet another reason to razz Dobber, one of four analysts who actually expected second place.
Big things were expected of the Stars, who added Jason Spezza and Ales Hemsky to a high-octane offense that already caught lightning in a bottle with Jamie Benn and Tyler Seguin. That's why 15% of analysts had the Stars in the top two, and only the Supporters View website had them finishing below fifth. What went wrong? It turns out there's a net in its own end too! The Stars have tried 11 different defensemen so far, few of whom have been effective in preventing shots. Kari Lehtonen hasn't bailed them out, and his backups, Jussi Rynnas and Anders Lindback, are a combined 0-6-0 with an .856 save percentage. Yowch! This team will improve, but probably has only a 1-in-10 shot at a wildcard spot.
What happens when you take one of the worst possession teams in the league and regress their goaltending back down to average? Last place! However, comfort with analytics wasn't a pre-requisite to predict this tumble, as analysts of all stripes placed last year's divisional champions in the bottom half this year. Interestingly, only Grant Jenkins had them in dead last, where they are most likely to finish. In fact, there's an outside chance they can finish 28th overall and get a good ticket in the Connor McDavid lottery.
The Pacific Division has been a little bit more unpredictable, in a sense. Four teams were pegged within a single position in the standings, and two more within two positions, but the number of points required for teams to fall within those expected positions were quite high in all but two cases (Vancouver and San Jose).
Team Win% Current Expected Difference Luck Index Projected
Anaheim .721 1st 2nd +8 pts +3 pts 1st
Vancouver .613 2nd 4th +3 pts 0 pts 2nd-4th
San Jose .606 3rd 3rd N/A -1 pt 2nd/3rd
Los Angeles .576 4th 1st -10 pts -1 pt 3rd-5th
Calgary .545 5th 7th +16 pts +2 pts 4th/5th
Arizona .419 6th 5th -8 pts -3 pts 6th
Edmonton .303 7th 6th -8 pts -10 pts 7th
The Ducks are a runaway favorite for the divisional crown, and Arizona and Edmonton will almost certainly finish sixth and seventh respectively, but almost anything could happen in the middle. Most likely, San Jose will edge Vancouver for second, while Los Angeles finishes far closer to those two teams than to Calgary in fifth.
Anaheim is a sparkling 10-0 in one-goal games decided in regulation. It also have four empty-netters while allowing two, potentially making a close-game record of 14-2. Can this continue? Well, last year's best close-game regulation record (Colorado) was 26-11, so probably not. The Ducks are nevertheless a strong team, and has built up a lead in the standings that should hold up through the remaining games, as just over half the analysts predicted.
The Canucks went off the board with a great possession-focused AHL coach, Willie Desjardins, and the results have been fantastic. Radim Vrbata has helped rejuvenate the Sedins, and the team has enjoyed far more secondary scoring than anyone could have hoped, with many players on track for career scoring highs. Being in second place is quite unexpected, with only two analysts, Donny Rivette and Adam Rickert, having predicted such. While there's great risk of the Canucks slipping down the standings once the team's scoring cools and the blue line thins out with injuries, only six more analysts even had them in third. This team is not out of the woods yet, though, with a 16% to 30% chance of missing the playoffs in consecutive seasons for the first time since 2000.
San Jose Sharks
Things are unfolding largely as expected this year in San Jose, who are on pace for about 95 points. That's still cutting it pretty close, however. The Sharks currently have about a 20% to 33% chance of missing the playoffs for only the second time since 1997 -- although only 10 analysts predicted them to tumble outside the division's top three.
Los Angeles Kings
The most pessimistic predictions for Los Angeles involved third place, and only 10 analysts were even prepared to go that low. What happened? As covered in a recent ESPN piece, the team's possession numbers have dropped, largely because of some blue line absences that are no longer forcing teams to dump-and-chase. That means the first place predictions were clearly wrong, that the champs are finally vulnerable, and that they will actually be scratching and clawing for a playoff spot if and when the goaltending cools down.
The Flames hopefully enjoyed their great start, because this is clearly the rebuilding team that everybody saw in September. True, there were a dozen analysts that saw the Flames finishing fifth or better, but the recent six-game losing skid has thrown some cold water on the optimists. This is one of the worst possession teams in the league, and while they are well-coached and have a great top pairing, we're starting to see what happens to this team when its shooting percentage drops below an unsustainably high 11%. While winning is never a bad thing, the sad news for Flames fans is that the hot start is more likely to deny them a good draft pick than it is to get them a wild card spot – but at least they have that shot.
New name, same result. Most experts pegged Arizona for fifth, but sixth was also seen as a strong possibility. This is a surprisingly disappointing team defensively, which is further aggravated by Mike Smith struggling through his worst season ever. The team's playoff hopes are essentially over, and it's in a roughly four-way race for the third best ticket in the McDavid lottery.
The Oilers may be bad, but they're not this bad. An 0-5 record in overtime, 0-1 in the shootout, a 7-12 close-game regulation record, a 7.3% team shooting percentage, and an opponent shooting percentage of 10.8% all add up to a miserable record for an otherwise near-average team. Only a quarter of the experts predicted the Oilers would trail the Pacific division (Dobber even had as high as them fourth), and now they're battling Buffalo for the Connor McDavid ticket.
No reasonable fan expects the experts to be right 100% of the time, but they would like to know what happened when they get one wrong, and see that information influence future predictions.
This exercise can also help those remaining fans who still see pre-season predictions as anything more than an entertaining point-in-time perspective. I've seen so many fans that take them far too seriously when even the collected wisdom of almost 100 experts can only peg five of these 14 teams within five points after only 30 games. The end-of-season standings are really anybody's guess. Have a safe holiday, and enjoy the balance of the 2014-15 season!
- Ramblings: Penguins, Pouliot, Pulock (May 22)
- Top 10 Worst Peripheral Forwards
- Ramblings: Preds Punch Ticket and a grab bag of player outlooks (May 23)
- Ramblings: Sens Force Game 7
- 2017 Off-season Outlook: Los Angeles and Winnipeg
- Broad Street Bullies hoping to Fly
- Looking Back on 2016 Fearless Forecasts
- Fantasy Hockey Podcast: Sens a Snore?